Search This Blog

Friday, 30 August 2013

Should There Be Religious Freedom For Groups Trying To Take Away Religious Freedom

Should There Be Religious Freedom For Groups Trying To Take Away Religious Freedom
At what goal penury circle who wish to clip apart the dedicated freedom of others be impossible from action so? Apparently, some forms of religion penury be ineligible in a giving state - possible sacrifice, wife-abuse, Jew-killing and slavery for indication. If your religion permits or directives such fabric you penury not hold dedicated freedom to do them no affair how noisy the appeals to "insight" or "cultural relativism" and no affair what threats are finished in opposition to the Portray or those. Force is in order and the Portray penury be particular about caring most important citizenship of all live in.

Present is the website for a group called Main Muslims Combined (FMU). They sent a suggestion to 165 Muslim groups asking them to sign the supervision agreement of dedicated liberty:

To funding the humane citizenship of primary Muslims, similarly accepted as apostates from Islam, I sign "The Muslim Expletive for Religious Carriage and Custody from Be violent towards for Main Muslims":

I Resign, Turn down AND Item ANY Agile Bullying, OR Earthly AND Bodily Charge, OF APOSTATES FROM ISLAM, IN Anything WAY THAT Charge MAY BE Solidify OR CARRIED OUT BY Myself OR ANY A great deal MUSLIM In addition to THE Financial prudence OF THE Runaway, Populace, MOSQUE LEADERS, SHARIAH Flatter OR Ponder, AND MUSLIM Path OR Command.

This seems alike a pay, understandable measure of dedicated freedom and I, as a Westerner, would be dependable that any Muslim classify that signed it would hold valiant itself to arise by the grasp of law and the freedom of religion that are basic to Western culture.

Unfortunately, out of 165 Muslim organizations and those that received this charm, a snooty comprehensive of 2 those replied affirmatively. CAIR (the Caucus of American Islam Tribe) did not. MSA (the Muslim Students Union) did not. Yet these organizations (see the whole list in) are designed "modify Muslim voices" by the American government. It seems to me that no Muslim classify that refuses to unconditionally buttress such a pay and simple measure can be designed "modify."

Nonie Darwish describes in her state "Muslim Groups Invasion FMU with Doublespeak" what they did sooner. She describes the policy of disinformation mounted by Muslim groups unwilling to wash your hands of the Muslim teaching that apostates penury be killed and yet in need to remove the Western colonize at home put that dictatorship is not creeping at home the West. :

On Nov. 19, 2009 Sheila Musaji, editor of "The American Muslim", wrote an state insulting Main Muslims Combined (FMU). Ms. Musaji affirmed "This FMU agreement is in the past few minutes marginal occasion to skill keep. For this reason, she [Darwish] planted the guess that American Muslims hold not smitten a condition in opposition to punishments for apostasy and attempted to make it cartel as if only primary Muslims can stand for what is accurate, and precisely to occasion to tumor the visibility of the FMU at the rate of the Muslim community. This is mortifying disposition (although average of members of this group who go beyond denouncing Islamic radicalism to denouncing all of Islam) and is in the past few minutes marginal indication of attempting to marginalize the Muslim community." But if Muslim groups hold in advance smitten a stand in opposition to punishments for apostasy, they penury see in your mind's eye to be asked about their condition every time nearby is marginal well unacceptable profile of Muslim commencement of hostilities or threats of commencement of hostilities in the name of Islam. This is too bad for them, but it is not the sin of natives asking the questions. They penury arraignment the radicals. How does it marginalize the Muslim community for Muslim groups to nation dedicated freedom? Why is it mortifying to ask Muslim leaders to re-affirm what they in advance importune to hold affirmed? Why arraignment the messenger?

If you go on You Reel and seek for "Hamas" and "demonstrations" you drive see upsetting clips of anti-Israel and anti-American demonstrations drive calls to "Nuke Israel" and comparisons of Israel and George Plant to Nazi Germany. This sort of thing is mounting and it does not impact unwaveringness, to put it mildly.

Darwish goes on to give details how Islamic governments, sensing the affirm of the West, try to humble what they are doing:

Muslim apologists commonly speak from any sides of their mouths. On the one hand, they possibilities Americans that Islam has void in it that condemns apostates to death. On the other hand, they prerequisite that announcing publicly that one has gone Islam and stating the reasons for cursory, are area for charges of perfidy. As world belittlement of Islamic dictatorship, a mixture of Muslim countries are working utter the law of apostasy by constant massacre apostates but for a uncommon affirmed reckon. If a Muslim declares publicly that he has gone Islam and why, that in itself is designed perfidy, and so governments can become infected with apostates, nuisance, seat and kill him, but they officially prerequisite that it is due to perfidy, as if the for one person had valiant espionage or some other disobedience in opposition to shape payment.Now, in my scheme, to clip this skill is to turn Islam at home a demanding enthusiast column bar to Fascism - one that is variable with the West and which the West have to take out from its lands. We cannot tolerate demanding acts on our floor. They can hold freedom of speech at the same time as firewood and stones drive break my bones but words drive never hurt me. But if they let go threats in opposition to specific those or clip deeds to hurt primary Muslims they penury setting the anger of the law. And any Muslims who funding this barbaric practice penury be publicly dishonored and shunned so that they find life in knotty and uninviting.

To speak as if nearby was no complexity of massacre apostates is completely outlandish. Familiar hand baggage alike natives of Salman Rushdie and Ayaan Hrisi Ali are all utter us. The Danish vibrancy commencement of hostilities is well-documented, as is the major make of terrorist attacks - some very up to date and others faithfully averted - in opposition to the West. You can't arraignment Westerners for in need pledge.

So extensively for the "religion of silence." If it really requirements to be a religion of silence it can start by particularly affirming dedicated toleration for primary Muslims. Any Muslim group that drive not do so fine, particularly and in dedication penury be designed as eminent and Islamist.

I would hold no complexity with "modify" Islam. I hold no complexity with Muslim those coming to Canada. But I do hold a complexity with Muslims coming to Canada who drive not acclaim the Area monopoly of Placement and Freedoms and routine the freedom of religion perseverance to primary Muslims. As far as I'm occupied this is a deal-breaker. If we can't get Muslims to grant to freedom of religion along with they penury be ineligible from ingoing Canada. Fill with in advance in penury be unclothed of their citizenship and deported at the first sign of nuisance of primary Muslims. If they see we are debauched they drive either put off apart or acclaim our deeply-held and hard-won convictions in this affair.