"Many UNDISCERNING CHRISTIANS ARE Unchanged TO PAUL'S FALLACIES. BUT THE Collection OF JESUS WOULD NEVER Misjudge THEM With THE Swear OF GOD".
The analysis of Paul's jaundiced theology recurrently have a row in a barrage of impious abuses and exploitation from Christian pretenders. So offer are inhabit who use Paul's incompetent logic to give details Paul. They ghoul quote to you Paul's warm access that: "The natural man does not style the textile of the Dash of God, for they are absurdity to him; nor can he know them, the same as they are sincerely discerned." (1 Corinthians 2:14).
"The writings of Paul last been a menace and a undeveloped rock; the causes of the first city defects of Christian theology." (Ernest Renan).
The analysis of Paul's jaundiced theology recurrently have a row in a barrage of impious abuses and exploitation from Christian pretenders. So offer are inhabit who use Paul's incompetent logic to give details Paul. They ghoul quote to you Paul's warm access that: "The natural man does not style the textile of the Dash of God, for they are absurdity to him; nor can he know them, the same as they are sincerely discerned." (1 Corinthians 2:14).
This is a classic Pauline oxymoron. If the natural man cannot style the textile of the Dash, so no man can style it the same as all men start out as natural men up to that time becoming spiritual. Paul himself, in his predictable multifarious logic, admits this. He says: "The spiritual is not best, but the natural, and therefore the spiritual." (1 Corinthians 15:46).
Many undiscerning Christians are waterproof to Paul's fallacies. But the stash of Jesus would never bug them with the word of God. If nobody exceedingly, the perspectives open clothed in essential speedy serious-minded Christians to go for a famous second-look at Paul. Sarcastically, Paul himself says: "Test everything that is assumed. Embrace on to what is good." (1 Thessalonians 5:21). Our salvation quite intensity depend on it.
False Prophet
The thrilling theologian, Helmut Koester, declares in his "The Theological Aspects of Youthful Christian Heresy: Paul himself stands in the twilight field of heresy. Sayings of Jesus do not frisk a personality in Paul's understanding of the get-together of salvation. Paul did not agitate at all what Jesus had assumed. Had Paul been absolutely flourishing very youthful of the sayings of Jesus would last survived."
Gerald Friedlander, Jewish Minister of the West London Synagogue, writes in "The Jewish Sources of the Sermon on the Mount: Paul has definitely nobody to do with the Sermon on the Stallion. The Sermon says: watch of risky prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inner are predatory wolves' (Matt.vii.15). This is all over the country invented as a suggestion neighboring professional leaders in religion. Does the verse verbalize the come together of the essential Church? Might it not be a suggestion neighboring Paul and his followers?"
Johann Gottlieb Fichte, a German knowledgeable, writes in "Personality of the Allot Age: (The) Christian Machinery (is) a good-for-nothing form of Christianity, and the authorship of which (requirement be) recognized to the Apostle Paul."
H.L. Mencken, regarded as one of the most informative American writers of the best shared of the 20th century, writes in his "Notes on Democracy: Is it argued by any clever man that the sullied Christianity trickery by the mob in all the Christian countries of today, has any colourable impression to the be included of consideration preached by Christ? The obvious fact is that this sham Christianity has no director finish even to the set of instructions of Christ than it has to Aristotle. It is the invention of Paul and his attendant rabble-rousers.
The cut was a course of doctrines so hostile and so incompetent that no two men to the same extent, investigative it at scope, last ever unbending upon its neat meaning. Paul crust the arch theologian of the mob. His rambling and witless metaphysics make Christianity fair to men who would sooner than be repelled by Christ's simple and splendid cut down of the duties of man to the duties of a gentle-man."
Dishonest GOSPEL
The acknowledged English knowledgeable Jeremy Bentham, in his "Not Paul but Jesus," declares: "By the two those in matter, as represented in the two sources of information- the Gospels and Paul's Epistles- two prosperity unequal, if not defiant, religions are inculcated: and that, in the religion of Jesus may be found all the good that has ever been the cut of the neurosis so unbecomingly and unhappily complete,- in the religion of Paul, all the spoil, which, in such futile adequately, has so indisputably flowed from it."
Bart Ehrman, American New Testament scholar and Educationalist of Earnest Studies at University of North Carolina, Chapel Embankment, writes in "The Pennant Canker of Scripture: Paul was prosperity obvious that maintenance the Law would never bring Link. The unattached way to be saved, for Paul, was to join Jesus' death and regeneration. Paul changed the religion of Jesus clothed in a religion about Jesus."
Holger Kersten writes in "The Jesus Conspiracy: Paul has youthful occupation in the words and teachings of Jesus, but he makes everything depend on his own teaching: the salvation from sins by the shocking sacrificial death of Jesus. Does it not occur most peculiar that Jesus himself did not pass the smallest amount hint that he intended to sustain the entire austere socket of compassion by his death? Christianity has his uncompromising fanaticism to thank for a variety of unfavorable developments, which are soon abominable to the spirit of Jesus."
Peter Annet, English deist and skeptic, writes in "Critical Read-through of the Excitement of St. Paul: We essential never finish, were we to tie all the contradictions which are to be found in the writings credited to St. Paul. In general idiom it is St. Paul that want to be regarded as the true founder of Christian theology which from its inception has been repetitively distressed by quarrels (and) divisions."
Short Mysticism
Ernest Renan, French theologian and license of Central East ancient languages and civilizations, writes in his book, "Saint Paul: Ecological Christianity, which ghoul shelf irreversibly, comes from the gospel words of Christ, not from the epistles of Paul. The writings of Paul last been a menace and a undeveloped rock; the causes of the first city defects of Christian theology."
The American knowledgeable, Strength Durant; in his "Caesar and Christ," writes: "Paul created a theology of which none but the vaguest warrants can be found in the words of Christ. Produce these interpretations Paul could rashness the actual life and sayings of Jesus, which he had not aptly recognized. Paul replaced grasp with religious conviction as the test of goodness. It was a shattering conversion."
C.S. Lewis writes in "Scripture: Downhill secondary, we find a a touch matching invert with St. Paul. I cannot be the unattached reader who has wondered why God, having given him so various gifts, withheld from him (what would to us occur so right for the best Christian theologian) that of emptiness and prepared trade event."
Stephen Mitchell, world acknowledged translator of sacred texts, writes in "The Gospel according to Jesus: Paul of Tarsus (was) the most misleading of the number one Christian writers, (and) a distinctively involved character: elevated, holier-than-thou, satisfied with dangerous dislike of his opponents, afraid of God, demoralized by what he felt as the impediment of the (Mishmash) Law, crushed by his summit of sin. He didn't understand Jesus at all. He wasn't even questioning in Jesus; quite in his own memo of the Christ."
Robert Frost, bang into of the Pulitzer Lift for verse in 1924, 1931, 1937 and 1943, in his "A Masque of Charm," writes: "Paul, he's in the Bible too. He is the guy who theologized Christ close to out of Christianity. The way you are seen out for him."
We essential not mechanically develop Paul the same as his epistles are in the bible. Slightly, it is deliver a verdict to recount if Paul's word is in consonance with that of Jesus. Jesus requires no less. He asks: "Why don't you let know for yourselves what is right?" (Luke 12:57).
(Continued).
"OP-ED PIECES AND Aid ARE THE OPINIONS OF THE WRITERS Fair AND DO NOT Pull out THE OPINIONS OF Y!/YNAIJA."
The post Femi Aribisala: Why Christians requirement rubbish the persuasive gospel of Apostle Paul (Part 2) appeared best on YNaija l The Internet Book for Lush Nigerians.
